About a week ago I had a conversation with the dean in which I firmly expressed that I did not want to be a sacrificial lamb for the partner placement initiative, such as it is, at CU. The dean firmly agreed and indicated that everything that could be done would be done to prevent it. I am acutely aware that the dean has two back up plans in place. I do believe this dean is committed to ensuring that Archer and I stay at CU. After all, as the dean reminded me, in the last 4 years, we've both brought in about $40,000 in grant money; Archer has made a name for himself in a fairly small field while teaching in a country that barely recognizes said field; I've designed 4 classes that have increased enrollment in 3 departments; and we've both demonstrated that we have strong research potential. All the while, the dean added, while staying on the job market and balancing our home life with our careers. The dean reminded me, however, (as deans are wont to do, I suppose) that sh/e could only control so much. The dean reiterated that the joint appointment as it has originally been envisioned was still the way sh/e preferred to go--for lots of reasons, the primary one being that the two departments are about to merge. I am the only person on campus who can teach in both departments. The plan makes a lot of sense.
In an entirely separate conversation with the chair of Research department, I again stated I did not want to be made a sacrificial lamb. RC (Research Chair) assured me that this was not going to happen, saying that if a decision was made by the appropriate committee to move forward with the interview then the appointment would go through. I said again, "I'm not sure I believe that is the case; however, this appointment reflects the career track I want to be on. Therefore, I will trust you." That is where I made my mistake.
The interview happened on Monday. I thought it went well. The questions following my talk turned into a conversation. Two faculty members stayed after the Q&A ended to follow up on issues in which our research areas overlap. The following interview was also a conversation. Lunch went well. The grad students seemed to like me. Dinner was a bit awkward, but it was fine. RC assured me I had put my best foot forward and that all would go well.
The dean called me yesterday about 40 minutes after Archer and I landed for our babymoon/research trip. The committee met sometime yesterday to finalize the appointment, or so I had been told before I left town. All had not gone well. I was, in fact, made the sacrificial lamb. I will not be holding a joint appointment in Research department and Teaching department. I know nothing more than that. I have a conference call scheduled with the chair of TD later today. I'm hoping to get answers, but I suspect TC will only be able to tell me so much. I may be scheduling a meeting with my union rep when we return to CU Land as well.
2 comments:
M, I'm so sorry. I know this is horrible timing (not that there is a good time). You're more determined than any person I know, so I really hope something comes through from all this. I just can't believe that they'd put you through such a sham of a process if the position was just going to fall through. I can understand all the anger you're feeling...I hope you're able to find some calm.
WHOA... just wow. I'm speechless. I'm so sorry and I hope you're enjoying your time in the U.S. and meetings with friends. This definitely, as you said before, one more demonstration of the horrific side of academic politics. Unbelievable. Why make you go through the whole thing like AcadeMama said.
Post a Comment